Stewart v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Delaware Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.
In an action brought by the appellants against the appellee, the court below rendered judgment for the latter upon a special verdict. The *219question as to which party was entitled to judgment upon the verdict is alone presented for determination.
The verdict showed that the appellants were partners in the business of buying and shipping live stock, and had been so engaged for four years, at Daleville, Indiana, between which place and Cleveland, Ohio, and East Buffalo, New York, the appellee was a com-" mon carrier; that on the 19th of September 1895, the appellants delivered to the appellee, at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bostwick v. . Baltimore and Ohio R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Black v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Kellerman v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Snow v. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Adams Express Co. v. CarnahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Parrill v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.