Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Bennett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 7236PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action the appellee sued the appellant, in a complaint of two paragraphs. In the first paragraph the appellee sought to recover damages of the appellant for an alleged breach of its common-law duty, as a common carrier *458for hire, in the transportation of freight. It is very clear, however, that the special findings and judgment below in this case were not founded upon the first paragraph of the complaint, and, therefore, it need not be further noticed.

In the second paragraph of his complaint the appellee alleged, in substance, that the appellant, before and at the time of committing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. RemmyIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Excelsior Draining Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Piel v. BrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HiggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hall v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API