Legal Opinion

People v. Eppstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1930No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

Leslie J. Eppstein and Alberta Eppstein, who are husband and wife, were informed against for issuing fictitious checks, a felony. Alberta Eppstein pleaded guilty and Leslie J. Eppstein not guilty, whereupon the cause was, as to him, set for trial. Before the trial date, however, the district attorney filed an amended information charging both husband and wife in three counts with the crime of issuing at Ontario in San Bernardino County three several fictitious checks and alleging as against the husband Leslie J. Eppstein, now appellant, the previous conviction of a felony.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. GlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. VertreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ChannellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. People v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. MacMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API