Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1964No. Crim. 8152PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

The People appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing count 1 of an information charging defendants, husband and wife, with conspiracy (Pen. Code, § 182, subds. 1 and 4) to violate Corporations Code section 26104, subdivision (a), and to commit grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. I).

It has been the rule in this state since 1889 (People v. Miller, 82 Cal. 107, 108 [22 P. 934]) that when spouses conspire only between themselves, they cannot be prosecuted for conspiracy. (See also People v. MacMullen, 134 Cal.App. 81, 83-85 [24 P.2d 794].) The rule was based on the common-law fiction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Self v. SelfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. United States v. DegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. LAWSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API