Louis Goldey Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
Plaintiffs have filed these 40 appeals for reap-praisement contending the appraisements are separable and that upon the basis of the proof offered the valuations fixed by the appraiser should have been on the basis of the invoice unit or ex-factory prices.
The- appeals for reappraisement, ■ consolidated for trial, involve marble door saddles and slabs exported from Italy in 1963,1964, and 1965. The marble came into the United States at Hew York, Boston, ■ *548Philadelphia, Baltimore, Wilmington, and Charleston where it was appraised on export value basis, under section 402(b) of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1966
- Louis Goldey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Pan American Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Louis Goldey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Louis Goldey Co.United States Customs Court · 1970
- Bowl-O-Beauty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975