Legal Opinion

Louis Goldey Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 21, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10725; Entry No. 864867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is from a finding of value made by the appraiser with respect to certain marble, exported from Italy on or about November 26, 1960, and entered at the port of New York.

The merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

Section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, sufra, reads as follows:

Export Value. — For the purposes of this section, the export value of imported merchandise shall be the price, at the time of exportation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Brechner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Golding Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louis Goldey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Louis Goldey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API