Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 2008No. B200145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

Defendants moved for summary judgment, noticing the hearing for less than the statutorily required period and setting the hearing within 30 days of the trial date absent prior court approval. Plaintiffs filed opposition papers raising these errors but did not address the motion on the merits.

At the noticed hearing, the trial court continued the hearing for four days, directed defendants to file papers showing good cause for entertaining the motion within 30 days of trial, and gave plaintiffs an opportunity to file opposition papers on the merits, which plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Carlton v. QuintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Lerma v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Urshan v. Musicians' Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimble v. WDW Joint Venture CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Villafana v. County of Los Angeles CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Wofford v. Hollicks CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API