White Water Valley Canal Co. v. Henderson
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This was an action of debt brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error.
The declaration alleges that differences having arisen between the parties relative to certain lands and materials taken by the canal company for the construction of their canal, the plaintiff, on the 6th of February, 1845, selected one Hyatt as an arbitrator on his part, and the defendant selected one Clements, and those two selected one Masters as the third arbitrator, for the purpose of arbitrating said differences, pursuant to the act of incorporation of 1842 (1); that said arbitrators, on said day…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hough v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- White Water Valley Canal Co. v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bruce v. OsgoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Belle v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Rigsbee v. BowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Rice v. LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 1867