State v. Bergeron
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the district judge to grant the defendant an appeal from a sentence imposed in a criminal prosecution.
The indictment was for the crime of bigamy, as denounced by section 800 of the Revised Statutes; the penalty having been increased by Act 93 of 1898, p. 116. Defendant filed a motion to quash the indictment, contending that Act 93 of 1898 was unconstitutional because it did not contain a reference to section 800 of the Revised Statutes, and did not define the crime of bigamy; and contending that, as section 800 was repealed by the statute of 189S, there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
- State v. EmswellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Arbintrode v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Grossman v. City of OaklandOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Galeo v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Burris v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PutfarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- State v. JosephLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. CoatsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.