Grossman v. City of Oakland
Oregon Supreme Court
From Douglas: J. C. Fullerton, Judge. S. Grossman, having pleaded guilty before the recorder of the City of Oakland of violating a certain ordinance, prosecuted a writ of review to the Circuit Court. His. proceeding was dismissed, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bean.
On June 12, 1894, the petitioner was arrested on a warrant of the Municipal Court of the City of Oakland, • issued upon a complaint charging him with having “committed a public nuisance within the platted portion of said city, by driving stakes as a part of the fence which he was then and there building along the side of the O. & C. Railroad, otherwise known as the Southern Pacific Railroad, contrary to ordinance No. 58 of the city,” and on a plea of guilty was fined $25. He thereupon sued out a writ of review to have the judgment of the recorder’s *483court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- City of Denver v. MullenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Village of Des Plaines v. PoyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Quintini v. Board of MayorMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Albright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Dibrell v. City of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Chan Sing v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.