Beebe v. Young
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal in Chancery.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley J.:
A motion is made to dismiss an appeal in Chancery in this case,- on the ground: 1st. That the return to the appeal was made by direction of the solicitors for the appellants to the office in Detroit, instead of the nearer one at Lansing, as required by the 'statute; and 2d. That the appeal hond is executed by one surety -only.
The first ground we do not think sufficient. The statutory provision requiring the return to be transmitted to the nearest Clerk’s oflice is not designed for the protection of the rights of parties, hut only for the orderly transaction of the business of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Wezel v. Van WezelNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- North American Coal Co. v. DyettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Potter v. BakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Ex parte ChryslinNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Garratt v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merriman v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Harris v. J. Regester & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Venator v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Kidd v. DoughertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886