Legal Opinion

Merriman v. Peck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to dismiss an appeal from tbe probate court. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Tbe will of Mary W. Merriman baying been admitted to probate, an appeal was taken upon No*278vember 25, 1892, to tbe circuit court for tbe county of Jackson. On the 25th day of January, 1893, none of the papers required by Act No. 174, Laws of 1887, had been filed in the circuit court, and proponent (the relator) obtained from the clerk a certificate to that effect, and filed the same with the probate judge, and served notice upon contestant's counsel of a motion to dismiss said appeal. A few hours later the required papers were filed, and upon the hearing of said motion it was denied. Relator…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Washtenaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Babcock v. TwistMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Garratt v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Beebe v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Verplank v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Merriman v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sokup v. Davis' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hosey v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bennett v. HickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Szarama v. Tylman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API