Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Teehee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1913No. 4574PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error from District Court, Cherokee County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by Carrie Cochran against Plouston B. Teehee, guardian. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Cherokee county. A stipulation as to the legal proposition involved entered into by counsel constitutes a sufficient statement óf facts, and is as follows:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the plaintiff, Carrie Cochran, is in fact, and was in fact, eighteen years of age on the 23d day of March, 1912. It is further agreed that she is a Cherokee Indian and enrolled as such and by said rolls approved by the Secretary of the Interior of the United States, she will not be eighteen years of age until September 17, 1913. It is further agreed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hancock v. Mutual Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Yarbrough v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Truskett v. ClosserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Kirkpatrick v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Brewer v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Yarhola v. DulingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Haddock v. BronaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.