Kirkpatrick v. Burgess
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe,, Judge. Action between J. E. Kirkpatrick and Daniel W. Burgess, a minor; Andrew Roth, guardian. From the judgment,.Kirkpatrick brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Tulsa county, and the sole question involved is presented by an agreed statement of counsel, wherein it is made to appear that one Daniel W. Burgess is a minor citizen of the Cherokee Nation, of one-eighth blood, and that Andrew Roth was his duly qualified and acting guardian, appointed some time prior to statehood. That on the 16th day of November, 1909, the county court of Tulsa county made an order licensing the said guardian to sell at public sale certain real estate of said minor, taken as an allotment. That notice of the sale was duly…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Brock v. KeiferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Murrow Indian Orphans' Home v. McClendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.