Haddock v. Bronaugh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, McClain County; F. B. Swank, Judge. Ejectment and for damages for withholding possession of' real estate and to cancel guardian’s lease thereon. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, sued defendants in error, V. Bronaugh et al., as defendants in the district court to recover possession of agricultural lands, and for damages for withholding same and for cancellation of guardian’s lease. Lucinda Davis, nee Amos, a Choctaw Indian and a minor, was the owner of the real estate -in controversy as allottee. By her guardian, said Lucinda made a lease contract with defendant Bron-augh covering the lands involved and other lands for four years from January 1, 1915, for agricultural purposes. Said lease was duly approved by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ozark Oil Co. v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Moffer v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Campbell v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Miller v. Tidal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Jennings v. CanadyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Billy v. McGillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.