Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Mills

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 9, 2011No. 10-1542PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

(February 9, 2011)

SMITH, Circuit Judge

Under the rules governing appellate procedure, a notice of appeal must “designate the judgment” from which the appeal is being taken. This case presents the question whether a pro se notice of appeal satisfies the judgment-designation requirement when, although it correctly identifies the parties to the appeal, the nature of the case, and the court to which the appeal is being taken, it erroneously references the docket number and trial date of an earlier case involving the same parties. We hold that where, as here, the surrounding circumstances…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brian Paladino v. K. NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Ari Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Haddrick Byrd v. Robert ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. State of Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Higgs v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API