Legal Opinion

Ari Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 27, 2018No. 17-3188PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Dr. Ari Weitzner and his professional corporation, Ari Weitzner M.D.

*607 P.C., challenge the District Court's conclusion on summary judgment that their claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) were untimely. There is no dispute that plaintiffs' TCPA claims-brought individually and on behalf of a proposed class-are untimely unless tolling applies. As a result, the primary question before this Court is whether tolling is available under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah , 414 U.S. 538 , 94 S.Ct. 756 , 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974).

American Pipe provides…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Nicini v. MorraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Christopher Blake v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  3. Bahaa Aly v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals InterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  4. Jay Folse v. Tiffany HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  5. Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Lg Electronics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API