Commonwealth v. Fair
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Appellant, Paul D. Fair, appeals from an order following a finding of violation of parole. His claim on appeal is that the parole violation order is (a) violative of double jeopardy principles; (b) excessive; and, (c) subject to vacation since representation at the hearing was ineffective. We find no merit to these contentions and affirm the order.
In October, 1982, Fair was given four to twenty-three month concurrent sentences upon a conviction in Lebanon County. He was paroled after the expiration of the mini mum sentence. In July, 1984, he was found to be in technical…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gundy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- McClure v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Farrow ex rel. Farrow v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. HunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Tillman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Jamison v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.