Legal Opinion

McClure v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1983No. Appeal, No. 340 Misc. Dkt. No. 3PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In this administrative appeal, Petitioner1 claims that his constitutional protection against double jeopardy and his constitutional right to due process afforded to bim by the Constitutions of the United States and Pennsylvania2 were violated by actions of the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) as hereinafter set forth.

*178While on. parole from a state correctional institution, after having served three years of a 3-7 year sentence, Petitioner was arrested for having a firearm in his possession. He was taken into custody and given a hearing by the Board as a technical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. KlobuchirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Harman v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Krantz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gundy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. FairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Coades v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API