Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Klem

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 30, 2008No. 07-1045PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Philmingo Jamison was sentenced to five to ten years imprisonment after pleading guilty to two separate criminal cases involving drug offenses. After unsuccessfully challenging his conviction in state courts, Jamison filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenged the voluntariness of his guilty plea. The Magistrate Judge to whom the petition was referred issued a thorough Report and Recommendation recommending that habeas relief be granted. That Judge concluded that Jamison’s plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. McMullen v. TennisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  3. Bryan v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  4. Milton Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Percell Dansberry v. Randy PfisterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API