Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1993No. 1029PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This appeal stems from an Order following a finding of violation of parole. Appellant’s claim on appeal is that the parole violation order is illegal and beyond the scope permitted under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9771. 1 We find no merit to this contention and affirm the order of revocation of parole.

The factual background leading to the revocation of Appellant’s parole and imposition of original sentence is as follows. On March 12, 1992, appellant pleaded guilty to Burglary and was sentenced to a term of incarceration of time served to twenty-three months, to be followed by one year’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. GambalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. ChilcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KalichakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Com. v. Simmons, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Commonwealth v. MeliusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. ShimonvichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API