State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Sheffield
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Presiding Judge.
After Clayton Price lost his criminal appeal, his lawyer was to file and handle a Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), but missed the filing deadline. Price later sought relief by ha-beas corpus, which Respondent Sheffield 2 granted, purporting to vacate the conviction and remand the case for retrial. We granted certiorari to determine if Respondent thereby exceeded her authority. 3
Background
A Taney County jury found Price guilty of sodomizing his fíancée’s six-year-old daughter. After Price’s trial counsel filed the new trial motion, he…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Hutton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Clayton Dean Price v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Marshall v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Marshall v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.