Legal Opinion

Burt v. Stringfellow

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1914No. 2603PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. G. W. Morse, Judge. Action by John A. Burt against Arthur Stringfellow and others. Judgment dismissing complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, appellant in this court, brought this action to recover a commission which he alleged he had earned under a certain contract which is set forth in and made a part of *210his complaint. The appellant, in his complaint, when stripped of all unnecessary verbiage and evidentiary averments, in substance, alleges that he is a licensed real estate broker; that on September 8, 1911, the respondents, Arthur, Augustus, Eva, Charles and Albert Moroni and Jane Stringfellow, Rose S. Miller, and Dora A. Taggert, entered into a certain agreement with him and one Parley Thueson, whereby the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Caine v. HagenbarthUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Neighbor v. Pacific Realty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Butterfield v. Consolidated Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Noon v. MironskiWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mathis v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Reese Howell Co. v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Beagley v. United States Gypsum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Burt v. StringfellowUtah Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API