Noon v. Mironski
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King ■county, Tallman, J., entered January 18, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant by direction of the court, in an action of forcible entry and detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The appellants leased a storeroom in the city of Seattle to the respondent for the purpose of conducting a bakery. The respondent conducted a bakery for some time, and finally began to sell some groceries in connection with the bakery; at least, this is the allegation of the complaint, and for the purposes of this case we may assume it to be true. The respondent was notified to quit keeping groceries for sale, and there was some discussion backwards and for*454wards between them on.the subject. The appellants gave him notice to vacate the premises and, upon his failure to do so, brought suit of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Estep v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- I. X. L. Stores Co. v. MoonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Burt v. StringfellowUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- Baron Bros., Inc. v. National Bank of SD, Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.