Reese Howell Co. v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon C. W. Morse, Judge. Suit for injunction by the Reese Howell Company, a corporation, against Sarah J. Brown and others, in which defendants other than named defendants were discharged on disclaiming all interest in the subject-matter. Judgment for named defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
Some time in 1911 or 1912, the exact time is not shown in the abstract, Reese Howell commenced an action against the defendants Sarah J., George F., and Elliott Brown to restrain them from closing a certain passageway used by Reese Howell. After the commencement of the action Reese Howell transferred all of his interest in the subject-matter of the action to the Reese Howell company, a corporation, and the action thenceforth proceeded in its name. The defendants George F. and Elliott Brown disclaimed all interest in the subject-matter of the controversy, and so they were eliminated from the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Slocum v. BracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Clifton v. Jackson Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Brown v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Carter v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
- American Unitarian Ass'n v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burdine v. SewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Stubbs v. HemmertUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Klinger v. KightlyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- United Park City Mines Co. v. Greater Park City Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Parrish v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.