Legal Opinion
Southern Railway Co. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 6, 1976No. Civ. A. 1776-73PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
This is an action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336(a), 2321-2325 1 to suspend, annul, or set aside the report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC or Commission) in Ex Parte No. 137, Contracts for Protective Services, 318 I.C.C. 111, decided August 27, 1962 (1962 Order).
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Parties and Contentions
Plaintiffs are several common carriers by railroad. 2 Defendants are the Commission and the United States of America, as statutory defendant under 28 U.S.C. § 2322. Intervening defendant is the Pacific Fruit Express Company (PFE), a company engaged in the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Insulation Transportation Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Chicago and North Western Transportation Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.