Legal Opinion · Dissent
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 19, 1977No. 75-2110PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1DissentOpinion for Court filed by Leven-Thal, Circuit Judge
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
In 1974 the United Transportation Union petitioned the Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant to § 5(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act1 to reopen the proceeding which had previously culminated in an order of December 31,1962, 317 I.C.C. 261, by which the Commission authorized the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company to acquire control of .the Baltimore & Ohio Railway Company. At first the Commission denied the petition to reopen. Subsequently after its order was challenged in the three-judge district court for Northern Ohio, the Commission sua sponte reconsidered, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Belco Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- American Train Dispatchers Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- In Re Program Management & Design Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.