Legal Opinion

Buskirk v. Buskirk

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2020No. B295648MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/9/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT WALTER VAN BUSKIRK III, B295648 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 18STPB07724) ELLEN J. VAN BUSKIRK, ORDER MODIFYING Individually and as Trustee, OPINION AND etc., et al., DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING Defendants and Respondents. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: IT IS ORDERED that the opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on August 14, 2020, be modified as follows: 1. On page 2, in the first sentence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API