In Re in the Interest of Paul S.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, Judge:
This appeal of Joseph and Pearl S., the parents of nine-year-old Paul S., is from the trial court’s order of September 25, 1987, directing that Paul be returned to foster care. Paul, who had been declared dependent and placed in the legal custody of appellee, Clearfield County Children and Youth Services (hereinafter “CYS”), had been residing with appellants for approximately three months on a temporary, trial basis.
Appellants raise three issues in this appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred in applying a “best interests” rather than a “clear necessity” standard in determining…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kozak v. StruthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In the Interest of PernishekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Lemnah v. American Breeders Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- In Re Donna W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of MatsockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In the Interest of D.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In re S.S. D.O.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Com. v. James, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2026