Legal Opinion

Kozak v. Struth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1987No. 62 Western District Appeal Docket, 1986PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Appellants, Patrick B. Kozak and Mary Ann Kozak, appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed Allegheny County Common Pleas’ judgment on a jury verdict for appellee Wayne Struth. They argue that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting appellee’s expert witness to comment on the totality of the evidence. Because an expert may not usurp the jury function by weighr ing and testing the credibility of other witnesses, we hold, under all the circumstances presented by this record, that admission of the particular expert testimony…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API