Kozak v. Struth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
Appellants, Patrick B. Kozak and Mary Ann Kozak, appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed Allegheny County Common Pleas’ judgment on a jury verdict for appellee Wayne Struth. They argue that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting appellee’s expert witness to comment on the totality of the evidence. Because an expert may not usurp the jury function by weighr ing and testing the credibility of other witnesses, we hold, under all the circumstances presented by this record, that admission of the particular expert testimony…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.