In the Interest of Pernishek
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants are the natural parents of Tamela, a young child diagnosed a psychosocial dwarf. They contend that the lower court erred in: (1) declaring Tamela a “dependent child” under the Juvenile Act 1 and (2) ordering her placement in a home for crippled children until she attains a certain height. We affirm with modifications and remand with directions for further proceedings.
On August 8, 1978, the Westmoreland County Children’s Bureau filed a petition alleging that Tamela, born November 3, 1969, was currently in a foster home and that two doctors had recommended that she…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Rinker AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In Re Frank W.D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Interest of Theresa E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Donna W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In the Interest of K. B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Fallaro v. YeagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.