Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Pernishek

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1979No. 1461PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants are the natural parents of Tamela, a young child diagnosed a psychosocial dwarf. They contend that the lower court erred in: (1) declaring Tamela a “dependent child” under the Juvenile Act 1 and (2) ordering her placement in a home for crippled children until she attains a certain height. We affirm with modifications and remand with directions for further proceedings.

On August 8, 1978, the Westmoreland County Children’s Bureau filed a petition alleging that Tamela, born November 3, 1969, was currently in a foster home and that two doctors had recommended that she…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Rinker AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re Frank W.D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In Interest of Theresa E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. In Re Donna W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. In the Interest of K. B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Fallaro v. YeagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API