Legal Opinion

Alban v. R. K. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1968No. 41203PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

The question raised by this appeal is the extent of the right-of-way or easement conveyed to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs contend that a grant of a right-of-way or easement on and over a parcel of real property described by metes and bounds creates a way over all of the property described. Defendant argues that such a grant only describes an unlocated or undefined right-of-way and therefore creates only the right to a reasonably convenient and suitable way over the property described.

Plaintiffs admit that defendant has provided and paved a ten-foot way across the parcel of land involved.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. S. Lang Engineering Co. v. Wilkins Potter PressMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Long v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Barrett v. DuchaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Bump v. SannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  5. In re the City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Crane Hollow, Inc. v. Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLCOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Wasserman v. Fremont (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API