Legal Opinion
In re Broome
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 10, 2003No. 25748PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*305DEFINITE SUSPENSION
2Per curiam
In this attorney-disciplinary matter, the Sub Panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct found, and the Full Panel agreed, that John C. Broome (“Respondent”) committed misconduct and recommended that he receive a public reprimand and pay proceeding costs. We find that the gravity of Respondent’s misconduct justifies harsher sanctions. Therefore, we hereby suspend Respondent for 90 days, order him to pay proceeding costs, and require that he be re-examined by the Committee on Character and Fitness before he may reactivate his license to practice law.
Factual/Procedural…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CarmickWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re ShehaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012