Legal Opinion

Molinelli v. Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 9, 1990No. 519, Docket 89-7569PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

The question on appeal of this civil rights action is whether, at the time of a 1986 urinalysis of a state prison guard, the law “clearly established” that urine testing was a search under the fourth amendment, making the defense of qualified immunity unavailable to the prison officials administering such tests unreasonably. We hold that the law in 1986 was not “clearly established” and that the defense is available.

I

Edward Tucker, acting superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, and other Sing Sing officials, appeal the order of the District Court for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Watson v. SextonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Kaminsky Ex Rel. Estate of Kaminsky v. RosenblumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Deutsch v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Hansen v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API