Legal Opinion

Hansen v. California Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 25, 1996No. C-95-2251 WDBPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Teresa Hansen was subjected by her employer, the California Department of Corrections (CDC), to drug testing involving direct visual observation of urination. Hansen is suing the CDC, its director at the pertinent time, the warden of the facility in which she worked, and the officers who administered the drug testing, alleging violations of the Fourth Amendment, the federal constitutional right to bodily privacy, and the California Constitution’s right to privacy. Defendants…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'TOOLE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Blanco v. County of KingsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  4. Allen v. SchiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API