Legal Opinion
Burka v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 1990No. 85 Civ. 5751 (RPP), 89 Civ. 6536 (RPP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This is a consolidation of challenges to the urine testing procedures utilized by the New York City Transit Authority (“TA”) since January 1, 1984 to test for use of marijuana. 1 The plaintiffs seek both monetary and equitable relief. During the trial of this case, the Court approved the parties’ agreement to bifurcate the issues of liability and remedy. In Burka v. New York City Transit Authority, 739 F.Supp. 814 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (“the Opinion and Order of June 5, 1990”), the Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law on the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
- Lewis v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Laverpool v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- English v. Talladega County Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Boyd v. ConstantineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.