Legal Opinion

Wessman v. Scandrett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1944No. Nos. 33,688, 33,689PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from orders denying their motions to vacate a dismissal of their actions made at the close of their case and to grant a new trial. The question presented by these appeals is whether defendants were guilty of negligence in failing to provide warning signs at their railroad crossing at a point a mile west of Brownton in this state.

About 4:40 o’clock of the morning of October 30, 1942, the plaintiff Arthur Wessman and his daughter LaVonne, together with other passengers, were driving south on state aid highway No. 15 and, in a dense fog, struck the side of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Rhine v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Setosky v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butler v. EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Flagg v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Mlenek v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API