Technical Development Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pek Cttkiam:
This case comes before the court from its Trial Division on exceptions of the parties to a recommended decision filed October 1, 1971, by Trial Commissioner James *241F. Davis, pursuant to Rule 134(h). The court has considered the case on the briefs and oral argument of counsel and, agreeing with the commissioner’s decision, adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in the case. Some additional observations, however, are in order, particularly as they relate to a procedural problem arising after the filing of the commissioner’s opinion.
Following the filing of the commissioner’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armstrong Cork Company v. John T. Lyons and Ruth E. Lyons, Co-Partners Doing Business as Lyons Utility CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- William C. Elmore v. William F. SchmittCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Freitag v. The Strand of Atlantic City, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Technical Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.