Legal Opinion
Huhta v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The four individual defendants were the common owners of a parcel of land in Stamford adjacent to the Merritt Parkway. The lot contained about .96 of an acre in a designed business zone and about 1.37 aeres in a residential zone. Pursuant to §19 (A) (2) (d) of the Stamford zoning regula tions, 1 they made application to the zoning board of appeals “that the nse permitted in the least restricted [designed business] section of their property ... be extended into the more restricted [residential] section” so that the entire lot could be used for a motel, a permitted use in the designed business…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Josephson v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shulman v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Gregorio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Cardoza v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Powers v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Farina v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.