Legal Opinion

Heard v. Burton

United States Customs Court

Decided June 25, 1964No. 7212PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kich, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Interference awarding priority of invention to Burton et al., the senior party. The junior party, Standard Oil Company (Indiana) substituted as assignee for Llewellyn Heard, deceased, appeals. The junior party will be called “Standard.”

Burton et al. are involved in this interference on application serial No. 283,997, filed April 23,1952. Standard is involved on application serial No. 504,793, filed April 29,1955, which is a continuation-in-part of serial No. 416,415, filed March…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Jacobs v. BuxtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Known as Life Technologies, Inc.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Knorr v. PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re Natta, Movant in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  5. The Dow Chemical Company v. Astro-Valcour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API