Legal Opinion

Wholesalers Board of Adjusters v. Norton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1936No. Civ. No. 10559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Appellant corporation is the assignee of The Cleaners Equipment Corporation, which latter corporation, on September 14, 1931, entered into written contract with respondents herein, whereby it agreed to sell, on conditional sale, cleaning equipment described in the contract, which contract guaranteed that the equipment would “supply 700 gallons of clean solvent per hour”, and contained other guaranties of parts of the equipment against defects therein by reason of faulty material or workmanship. The contract also provided, “This instrument covers all conditions of this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Von Schrader v. MiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Stewart v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Nevada Land Inv. Corp. v. SistrunkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Leonard v. Home BuildersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Riverside Rancho Corp. v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. (PS) Towers v. Post Properties LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API