Legal Opinion
CBK Brook House I Ltd. Partnership v. Berlin
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 3, 2005No. 04-P-1120PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1. By amendments in 1984 to the master deed for the Brook House condominium, and while CBK owned all of the units in the condominium (see note 2, infra), CBK retained an affirmative easement interest in parking spaces within the transient garage. By doing so, CBK did not run afoul of G. L. c. 183A or governing Massachusetts decisions. See, e.g., Commercial Wharf E. Condominium Assn. v. Waterfront Parking Corp., 407 Mass. 123, 130 (1990), S.C., 412 Mass. 309 (1992); Queler v. Skowron, 438 Mass. 304, 313 (2002).
The 1984 amendments to the master deed did not (as BHC has argued) divide the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Barclay v. DeVeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Strauss v. Oyster River Condominium TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Queler v. SkowronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madowitz v. Woods at Killington Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Busalacchi v. McCabeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Madowitz v. WOODS AT KILLINGTON OWNERSSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Gold Creek North Ltd. Partnership v. Gold Creek Umbrella Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Gold Creek North Ltd. Partnership v. Gold Creek Umbrella Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.