Legal Opinion

Queler v. Skowron

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 19, 2002PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

Bishops Forest Condominium (BFC) and Bishops Forest II Condominium (BF II) are adjoining condominiums located in Waltham that were built as part of a “phased” development plan. The plaintiffs are various unit owners and mortgagees of BF II; the defendants are trustees and unit owners of BFC, as well as the original developers of BFC and BF II. Following disputes over cost-sharing arrangements between the two condominiums, the plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory relief and damages. In particular, they sought a declaration that BF II was lawfully created and that its unit owners held…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. First Universalist Society of North Adams v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Pineo v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Grace v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Barclay v. DeVeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bourne v. Northwood Properties, LLC (In Re Northwood Properties, LLC)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Adams v. WhitmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Martin v. Simmons Properties, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Hickey v. Pathways Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Murphy v. OlsenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API