Legal Opinion

Gold Creek North Ltd. Partnership v. Gold Creek Umbrella Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 2008No. 35301-6-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*194¶1 The Millers1 sued the Gold Creek Umbrella Association (Association) to establish an express easement for ingress and egress across Association property to the Millers’ adjoining property to the north. When the Millers rested, the Association moved to dismiss under CR 41(b)(3) (failure to prove a claim). The trial court ruled that the Millers were entitled to an express easement across the Association’s property. The Association raises a number of issues but principally argues that the trial court should have dismissed the Millers’ express easement claim. We agree; accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Daly v. RizzuttoWashington Supreme Court · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gunn v. RielyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. RAINIER VIEW COURT HOMEOWNERS v. ZenkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Academy Square Condominium, V Keith & Nicole KawawakiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Rainier View Court Homeowners Ass'n v. ZenkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Robert Gunn, V Terry And Petra RielyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API