Legal Opinion
United States v. Parra
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 2004No. S1 02 CR. 348(PKL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, Districct Judge.
Defendants Claudio Parra and Jorge Ortega are charged with conspiracy to distribute or possess with intent to distribute cocaine and with distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The trial in this matter will begin on January 26, 2004. The government now moves in limine for a ruling that it may introduce statements made by defendant Parra at any of three proffer sessions to impeach Parra or to rebut arguments made on Par-ra’s behalf that contradict Parra’s proffer statements. Parra opposes the government’s motion on the grounds…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCall v. RiveraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- RAGHAVENDRA v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. JimDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- United States v. DeantoniDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- United States v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.