Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Ha

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2000No. S-9227PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Arthur Martinez appeals the superior court's grant of summary judgment to Dr. Young H. Ha on Martinez's claims of medical malpractice and failure to obtain informed consent. Because Martinez's appeal relies upon facts and allegations that were not properly submitted to the superior court, Martinez may not rely upon them in this court. We therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment by the superior court.

II FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Dr. Young H. Ha is an orthopedic surgeon who performed a total left knee replacement on Arthur Martinez in September…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Newton v. MagillAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parker v. TomeraAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Angleton v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Alaska Construction Equipment, Inc. v. Star Trucking, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hutka v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API