Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Train

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 23, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-10087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.

This cause came on for a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction limited to Counts One and Two of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff alleges that the Administrator is violating the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief prohibiting the Administrator:

1. From consideration or use of plaintiff’s trade secret and confidential commercial information in support of any application for registration or reregistration of a pesticide under FI-FRA;

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Llewelyn v. Oakland County Prosecutor's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  3. MOBAY CHEMICAL CORP., CHEMAGRO AGR. DIV. v. TrainDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mobay Chemical Corp. v. CostleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
  2. Sam P. McGill v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1985
  4. Andrews v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan (In Re Clawson Medical, Rehabilitation & Pain Care Center, P.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. CostleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API