Legal Opinion
Bracken v. Harris & Zide, L.L.P.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 8, 2004No. C-02-05146 RMWPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO ADD CO-TRUSTEES OF THE ROBERT T. HARRIS TRUST AS DEFENDANTS
WHYTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nathan Bracken’s motion for leave to add the Robert T. Harris Trust and its co-trustees as defendants was heard on December 19, 2003. Defendants opposed the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants leave to add the co-trustees of the Robert T. Harris Trust as defendants.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 23, 2003 plaintiff filed a complaint against Robert T. Harris, Flint C. Zide, Harris & Zide, and Frank Tirre alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Richard L. Smith and Deborah L. Smith v. No. 2 Galesburg Crown Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Breeden v. HueserMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ohanian v. Irwin (In Re Irwin)District Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Acebal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Jim 72 Properties, LLC v. Montgomery ClearnersDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- (PC) Stribling v. LuceroDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.