Legal Opinion
Acebal v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 6, 2004No. 01-47CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for overtime pay brought by more than 100 employees of the Bureau of Prisons under the overtime provisions of the Federal Equal Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542, 5544, 5546 (2000) (“FEPA”), and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C §§ 201-216 (2000) (“FLSA”). Four plaintiffs have died since this action commenced. Before the court are plaintiffs’ motions pursuant to Rule of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 25(a)(1) to substitute the widows for the deceased plaintiffs. Defendant opposes the motions.
BACKGROUND
Since…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Robertson v. WegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Cox v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Denis J. Murphy, Trustee v. Household Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grass Valley Terrace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Turner v. Sullivan University Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
- Snyder v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bailey v. MacFarlandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Johnson v. AFASSCO, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.