Breeden v. Hueser
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The question presented here is whether a claim against a doctor that arises out of unauthorized and duplicative billing practices falls within the range of actions subjected to the two-year statute of limitations applicable to certain actions brought against health care providers. See 516.105, RSMo Supp.2008. 1 Plaintiffs in this case appeal the circuit court’s judgment of dismissal based on the two-year filing timeframe. This court finds that the Plaintiffs’ claims are not subject to section 516.105 and reverses the circuit court’s dismissal.
Factual…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lukasik v. San Antonio Blue Haven Pools, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Sisters of St. Mary v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State Ex Rel. National Refining Co. v. SeehornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Ellison v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Eckel v. EckelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hansen v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Kixmiller v. Board of Curators of Lincoln UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.